Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras

Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras (https://www.seccs.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat (https://www.seccs.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   New Sti S announced today... (https://www.seccs.org/forums/showthread.php?t=2554)

MattR 2004-12-27 07:36 PM

New Sti S announced today...
 
Heres the link,,hot.,

http://www.subdriven.com/news/publis...icle_307.shtml

Dean 2004-12-27 07:47 PM

Idiots... They could sell 5555 of them in the US alone...

I didn't see anything on the steering ratio, but very cool...

tysonK 2004-12-27 09:35 PM

Everything about that car is hawt!

OMG, those wheels, those seats, better turbo, damn!

JC 2004-12-28 12:18 AM

rice

MattR 2004-12-28 08:14 AM

Okay, in reading that article again, that car is just friggin hot...

It's 18" BBS's are lighter than the 17's that come on the stock STI,,,sweet.

murphy 2004-12-28 08:21 AM

nice very nice.

sti deede 2004-12-28 09:05 AM

It's beautiful. :D

sonicsuby 2004-12-28 09:14 AM

The seats in that car are a work of art. They should be in the louvre.

AtomicLabMonkey 2004-12-28 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonicsuby
The seats in that car are a work of art. They should be in the louvre.

They're just Recaro recliners, there's nothing that special about them.

MikeSTI 2004-12-28 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
Quote:

Originally Posted by sonicsuby
The seats in that car are a work of art. They should be in the louvre.

They're just Recaro recliners, there's nothing that special about them.

- We have added special reclining Recaro front sport seats with gray Alcantara center surfaces to help keep driver and passenger firmly held in place during spirited driving. These seats are constructed with carbon fiber shells and therefore are lighter and stronger than the seats offered in the base STi.

I wish my stock car came with carbon fiber seats

AtomicLabMonkey 2004-12-28 09:33 AM

Don't get me wrong - they're nice. Just not quite in the same company as Leonardo da Vinci. :lol:

MikeSTI 2004-12-28 09:37 AM

how many reclining carbon fiber seats are on the market? 1 :lol:

MikeK 2004-12-28 09:44 AM

Is this the 2.0L engine with the forged goodies? I wonder if we will ever see this or the Spec C STi in the US.

MikeSTI 2004-12-28 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeK
Is this the 2.0L engine with the forged goodies? I wonder if we will ever see this or the Spec C STi in the US.

Yes
&
No :cry:

Kevin M 2004-12-28 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSTI
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeK
Is this the 2.0L engine with the forged goodies? I wonder if we will ever see this or the Spec C STi in the US.

Yes
&
No :cry:

Actually it's yes and a distinct possibility. SOA's watching EVO MRs fly out of dealerships. Expect a US version of the Spec C with an EJ257 within a year.

MikeK 2004-12-28 04:12 PM

Bah, I want the 2L with the forged pistons :(

Kevin M 2004-12-28 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeK
Bah, I want the 2L with the forged pistons :(

Too bad. :( You can't get 300 hp out of 2 liters in this country because of emissions requirements.

MikeK 2004-12-28 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Too bad. :( You can't get 300 hp out of 2 liters in this country because of emissions requirements.

Maybe not out of the factory, but with aftermarket parts, I think the ej207 spec c engine has more potential than the ej257 does.

Kevin M 2004-12-28 04:20 PM

Personally, I think the bigger engine is the better idea, because the design of the EJ series causes issues at very high RPM. No high revs, no advantage to the smaller engine. I'll take an 8k EJ25 over a 10k EJ20 anyday, especially considering the lack of proper gearing choices for such a high-rev engine.

AtomicLabMonkey 2004-12-28 04:32 PM

There's no replacement for displacement.

Kevin M 2004-12-28 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
There's no replacement for displacement.

Sure there is, it's forced induction and high RPMs when you're talking about race applications (see Formula 1). Unfortunately, Boxer motors aren't conducive to those conditions.

AtomicLabMonkey 2004-12-28 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
There's no replacement for displacement.

Sure there is, it's forced induction and high RPMs when you're talking about race applications (see Formula 1). Unfortunately, Boxer motors aren't conducive to those conditions.

Apples to oranges if you're talking N/A vs. forced. All things being equal, the bigger engine is going to make more power.

BOO 2005-01-04 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
There's no replacement for displacement.

Sure there is, it's forced induction and high RPMs when you're talking about race applications (see Formula 1). Unfortunately, Boxer motors aren't conducive to those conditions.

Apples to oranges if you're talking N/A vs. forced. All things being equal, the bigger engine is going to make more power.



Question??
Is this true without having to use race fuel/methanol?

Kevin M 2005-01-04 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOO
Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
Apples to oranges if you're talking N/A vs. forced. All things being equal, the bigger engine is going to make more power.



Question??
Is this true without having to use race fuel/methanol?

Actually, more displacement helps you out by letting you run ower octane in most cases. If you take a given motor setup- NA, a given supercharger, a given turbo, the larger motor is going to make more torque at a lower RPM. It's particularly true of big NA motors like V8s, but not so much with turbocharged motors. Your limits of torque are determined solely by the size of the turbo and your fuel. Motor size only changes how fast it has to spin to flow the amount of air needed to make the torque the turbo supports.

BOO 2005-01-04 09:42 PM

Thanks for the answer :)

dknv 2005-01-05 02:07 PM

OMG!
"- Exclusive red hazard switch."

dknv 2005-01-05 02:08 PM

Translator: how many dollars is?:
4,609,500 yen

Kevin M 2005-01-05 02:34 PM

www.xe.com

4,609,500.00 JPY = 44,273.73 USD
Japan Yen United States Dollars

MattR 2005-01-05 02:34 PM

Sounds fair.

Kevin M 2005-01-05 02:35 PM

If I were in the market for a $45-50k sports car, I'd have that at the top of the list.

And the production numbers are low for a reason, like hand assembly of the engine, etc. Not to mention the fact that the low production numbers mean the car will hardly depreciate at all, and probably eventually surpass its original value.

AtomicLabMonkey 2005-01-05 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
If I were in the market for a $45-50k sports car, I'd have that at the top of the list.

Hmm... a new $45-50k sports car. I'd have a different selection at the top of my list.

http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20022124-E.jpg

BOO 2005-01-05 03:17 PM

Hence the "Displacement" comment.. huh ALM ;)

AtomicLabMonkey 2005-01-05 03:30 PM

400hp, good brakes, fairly stiff chassis, a well tuned suspension and a low C.G. straight from the factory is pretty hard value to beat. 8)

MikeSTI 2005-01-05 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
400hp, good brakes, fairly stiff chassis, a well tuned suspension and a low C.G. straight from the factory is pretty hard value to beat. 8)

the 2 seater kills it for me :cry:

I did love my vett but the family was always waving by vs. riding along in the STi

MattR 2005-01-05 04:03 PM

C6!!!!!!

:brillian:

Kevin M 2005-01-05 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
400hp, good brakes, fairly stiff chassis, a well tuned suspension and a low C.G. straight from the factory is pretty hard value to beat. 8)

You also just described the S203, with the exception of the fact you have to get 400 hp out of it with a little exhaust work and tuning. Back to apples and oranges. Plus, there's the rarity factor. It's like the "King Of The Hill" ZR1s. a C6 would run rings around one, but which one goes for $100k+? Anyways, C6s friggin rule. I wouldn't kick one out of bed for eating crackers. ;)

Edit: Besides, I'm a moderator for an import enthusiast bored and you work for a premier aftemarket domestic tuner... the world would cease to exist if we ever came to an absolute, no-holds-barred agreement when it came to cars. :P

MattR 2005-01-05 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
I'm a moderator for an import enthusiast bored

either ISWYDT or you're tired. :lol:

Nick Koan 2005-01-05 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
..import enthusiast bored ..

so now you're saying i-club is boring? I'm telling Alex.

Kevin M 2005-01-05 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattR
Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
I'm a moderator for an import enthusiast bored

either ISWYDT or you're tired. :lol:

The intarweb is making me stoopider! :lol: x eleventy

Yeah, I'm seriously not sure if I'll make it to sundown even now. :P

MattR 2005-01-05 04:44 PM

Mattr > nKoan....

I beat you like a rented mule son. :roll:

Kevin M 2005-01-05 04:47 PM

NV>... oh wait, NM. :lol:


I prefer Keith Olbermann's "beat him like a rented goalie" :P

MattR 2005-01-05 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
NV>... oh wait, NM. :lol:


I prefer Keith Olbermann's "beat him like a rented goalie" :P

Indeed, that is the greatest...

careful Nevermind NM can = New Mexico NM, and that may start a whole new turf war with the loco SWIC... :lol:

Kevin M 2005-01-05 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattR
Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
NV>... oh wait, NM. :lol:


I prefer Keith Olbermann's "beat him like a rented goalie" :P

Indeed, that is the greatest...

careful Nevermind NM can = New Mexico NM, and that may start a whole new turf war with the loco SWIC... :lol:

I saw that after I posted it. And didn't care. :P

Didn't we already give them LV in the cease fire agreement anyway?

Nick Koan 2005-01-05 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattR
Mattr > nKoan....

I beat you like a rented mule son. :roll:

Hostile today, aren't we? :p

MattR 2005-01-05 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nKoan
Quote:

Originally Posted by MattR
Mattr > nKoan....

I beat you like a rented mule son. :roll:

Hostile today, aren't we? :p

"You're about to find out.."

No, really, I was this morning, but I'm okay now..

AtomicLabMonkey 2005-01-05 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
the world would cease to exist if we ever came to an absolute, no-holds-barred agreement when it came to cars. :P

Agreed. I like living, let's keep it up. :lol:

JC 2005-01-05 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
If I were in the market for a $45-50k sports car, I'd have that at the top of the list.

Hmm... a new $45-50k sports car. I'd have a different selection at the top of my list.

http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20022124-E.jpg

I'd rather have a fast problem free car. I really don't need the extra mullet attraction factor either.

Kevin M 2005-01-05 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JC
I'd rather have a fast, problem free car.

Name one, dude. :P

Dean 2005-01-05 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Quote:

Originally Posted by JC
I'd rather have a fast, problem free car.

Name one, dude. :P

Anything Brittish! :lol:

AtomicLabMonkey 2005-01-05 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JC
I really don't need the extra mullet attraction factor either.

Wrong Chevy, Camaros are the mullet magnets.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.