![]() |
Fantasy F1 - 2009 Edition!
Well, the FIA still hasn't told us the team/drivers lineups for 2009, but I'm pushing forward with setting up the FF1 site for '09 anyway.
I've got no participants, and I'm still listing the '08 schedule and drivers. But I think I can get the 2009 schedule up there w/o having to make any major changes, and use the drivers as best we know until we find out what's happening with Honda and/or third drivers. Does anyone want to make some changes to the fantasy rules for the upcoming season? I don't want to do anything drastic because I don't have time to re-code the scoring engine. But I was thinking of bumping to 10 or 12 picks per driver for the season so we don't run out of big-name drivers so quickly. Thoughts? Also, if you're interested in participating this season, post up in here. I'll bump this thread when I open registration for the season! |
I'm interested. I have no input on modifications.
|
I'm in for 09. I don't think any mods are neccessary, perhaps increasing driver picks to 12 would create some more contenders. Whatever the group wants to do is cool. Thanks for putting this together Scott.
|
I will participate, but I vote that skimonkey is banned.
|
I actually watched all the races last year so I'm obligated to participate
Watch for a lot of random picks |
Quote:
12 picks sounds good to me |
Quote:
|
I think 12 picks might be a little much for a 17 round season... you could pick MAS RAI HAM ALO together in all but 5 rounds for example.
I'm leaning towards 10 right now. With 4 "top" drivers, that's potentially an extra 80 points out there for picking race wins without taking away the strategy of having to choose when to use the big name drivers. |
Quote:
|
10 is good, I'm in.
|
Okay folks!
I've updated the FF1 website with the 2009 schedule. I do not have all the teams/drivers updated... I've been waiting for Honda info, but since the first race is in just a few weeks, I'm opening up registration. Please post here, or email me to sign up. Then pay via the PayPal link here: http://ff1.seccs.org/index.php?page=faq (Same process as the last two seasons) I'll start updating the drivers/teams as soon as I can! So don't freak out over the '08 season data that's still in there. |
I'm in. How much is the paypal amount 21.21?
|
Quote:
|
Please sign me up.
|
Quote:
|
got it thank you.
|
i'm in
|
Quote:
|
Hey Matt, is Carrie playing this season?
|
I think so, I'll ask her when I get home tonight. I'll paypal my money later, I can't remember my account password, I have it at home. ha.
|
maybe i can get dayna to play
she likes f1 now :devil: |
Sweet!
|
Less than a week to go! :D
Time to start putting your picks in for Australia. |
Here's a fun F1 waste of time: http://www.mousebreaker.com/games/gr...ycoon/playgame
|
Just 10 hours 'till the start of the season! Last chance to sign up. For those of you already registered, get your picks in ASAP!
|
I have my picks in but may try to make one more edit after P3.
|
Only 5 hours to go and a bunch of people haven't made their picks!
dayna_k8 MikeK motoring skimonkey tysonK, get on it! |
Just for some further clarification on the half-point scoring for this round:
Since the rules from the start were "Based on official F1 results, if a participant's picked drivers score World Championship points, then the participant scores the same number of fantasy points", and because I was able to modify the FF1 software to account for the weirdness, we will be giving out partial points for this round. Since everyone's in the same boat, it shouldn't have a drastic effect on our season standing, other than having to look at all those non-round numbers all season long. |
God, if looking at prime numbers wasn't bad enough, now I've got to look at fractions?
|
Quote:
|
AAAHHHH, the half-wits will prevail!
|
Quote:
I really don't want to go down the road where we're second guessing the official results... for example, if someone is excluded from championship points, that will be reflected in our points... otherwise, technically Hamilton crossed the line 4th in Australia, but we're not going to score fantasy points for Hamilton in 4th because we might disagree with his later exclusion, right? Similarly, if Malaysia is only worth half points, then that's just tough luck for those of us that picked Button (assuming Button goes on to win 9 more times this season and we miss out on a 10 point win we could have scored if not for the 5 point win we picked in Malaysia). At the end of the season, the driver's point totals in our result should exactly match the official FIA point totals. All in all, I don't think it's all that different from picking a good driver that ends up getting hit from behind, or is otherwise taken out of the race to no fault of his own. Sometimes events are out of our control, and a good pick nets nothing. Personally, I"ll take those 5 points for Button, because I think by the end of the season, Ferrari and McLaren are going to be back up at the top of the results, and I'll be glad I got those early Brawn points before they're back to being mid-packers. :( But you do have a good argument that I'm not trying to dismiss offhand or anything. Picking poorly this past round could certainly work to your advantage later in the season. Some people may have lucked out, and some of us are getting the bad luck balance. I just think that in this situation, the most fair action is to stick to the letter of the way the rules were written. If we had awarded full points for the round, those on the other side of the coin would have a more valid (IMO) argument that we weren't sticking to the rules. |
On another note... did anyone else want to punch themselves in the face at the start of the race w/ the Fast and Furious tie in segment? :unamused:
|
I couldn't stop laughing at how bad it was.
|
I missed that I guess.
|
They showed it during the pre-race show, on the entry or exit of a commercial break (I forget).
It was laughably bad. |
I was trying to see if I could find the video on SpeedTVs website, but ended up getting distracted by Steve Matchett's "Chalk Talk" videos.
http://formula-one.speedtv.com/artic...gp-chalk-talk/ and http://formula-one.speedtv.com/artic...gp-chalk-talk/ |
Quote:
|
I've been watching the BBC Sport feed it's pretty decent.
thank you internet. |
|
Quote:
Hell, they've probably been working on them since the season started... but with testing only allowed at the track on Fridays, Brawn still has a bit of an advantage window. |
True. If you consider the resources McLaren and Ferrari have, it will probably only be a race or two before they are the top teams again. It would be nice to see a 3 or 4 way tie for the constructors championship late into the season.
|
Interesting to consider also, is that I feel like the Red Bull has been extremely quick and consitent without the advanced diffuser, thay car should be a real frontrunner with some aero upgrades.
|
Quote:
|
According to the last paragraph in this article, red bull should have a new diffuser on their car by Monaco.
|
Quote:
|
There's quite a few folks that believe it may be Timo's time for a win. He and Jarno have been impressive so far and they appear to have the cars to do it. Ferrari dumps the KERS for China, yet it's still doubtful that they have what's needed to overcome the advantage of the stacked difusers.
|
|
Wish he had some real pictures of them on the cars and the battery systems.
That is the innovation F1 should be making. 80HP in something that small. can you imagine 1 on each of four corners of a plug in electric sports car? That is one of the technologies to make things like The Skateboard a reality in the next decade. |
If you haven't seen this, it's pretty cool.
A computer-animated clip features Mark Webber and Sebastian Vettel racing on track, as they bring to life the biggest rule changes in the history of Formula One. http://link.brightcove.com/services/...tid10497901001 |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.