Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras - View Single Post

cody · 2009-05-30, 09:23 AM

There are plenty of examples where the CR data conflicts with the TR data. You especially have to take things as subjective as noise and harshness with a grain of salt.

The Yokes were better than the RE92's in the dry and wet...just not by as large of a margin as I had expected. When I replaced the 92's with Proxes 4's, I was amazed at how much of a difference it made. I loved the P4's. However, I ran the P4's in 225/50/16 so I can attribute some of their grip to the extra width. But I honestly liked the P4's more so than the 215/45/17 Yokes. Although there was a bit of sidewall flex, they were as sticky as the Yokes in the dry and wet, yet could safely be used to go over the pass in deep snow.

2009-05-30, 09:23 AM	#117
cody Candy Mountain Real Name: Cody Join Date: May 2005 Location: Californication Posts: 7,751 Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink! Class: TESP OMG Internet!	There are plenty of examples where the CR data conflicts with the TR data. You especially have to take things as subjective as noise and harshness with a grain of salt. The Yokes were better than the RE92's in the dry and wet...just not by as large of a margin as I had expected. When I replaced the 92's with Proxes 4's, I was amazed at how much of a difference it made. I loved the P4's. However, I ran the P4's in 225/50/16 so I can attribute some of their grip to the extra width. But I honestly liked the P4's more so than the 215/45/17 Yokes. Although there was a bit of sidewall flex, they were as sticky as the Yokes in the dry and wet, yet could safely be used to go over the pass in deep snow. __________________ Slow and low, that is the tempo.