View Single Post
Old 2009-09-09, 06:58 PM   #18
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean View Post
Did you not read what I wrote?

My comments were specific to a specific table and modifications to the intake path. Those would apply no matter the tuning method or altitude. If you disagree with those, please specify why.

Unless you are clairvoyant, the root cause of my engine failure has yet to be determined and based on the current evidence, it is likely to be due to an under-performing injector at high load. I did make boost related changes to multiple tables at lower elevation to resolve an over boost situation that might have contributed or even caused the failure, but the cylinder that failed is not one of the usual suspects and I caught the situation fairly quickly. I will gladly provide results after the injectors get tested when I get the rebuild done. Don't fret, if I blew it up, I will take the blame/credit.
I did read what you wrote. You wrote that what I wrote was a fallacy and then offered an irrelevent piece of information. Did you read what you quoted?

KS seems to disagree that it's a "fallacy".

Quote:
Originally Posted by knucklesplitter View Post
Tunes at sea level are usually safer when going high than tunes at elevation going low
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote