View Single Post
Old 2009-09-09, 07:58 PM   #20
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody View Post
I did read what you wrote. You wrote that what I wrote was a fallacy and then offered an irrelevent piece of information. Did you read what you quoted?

KS seems to disagree that it's a "fallacy".
It is not irrelevant. My point was that any tune involving a intake change can be dangerous with an altitude change. Your claim was that one was better than the other.

I have seen a number of maps where tuners rather than taking the time to fix the intake map, just mess with the A/F tables for the WB reading they are looking for...

Quote:
Originally Posted by KS
The MAF sensor and barometric pressure sensor compensate the fueling at elevation... usually.
The barometric tables can't compensate correctly when the intake map is wrong and A/F targets have been tweaked for a particular altitude. If the problem is beyond the real time trims ability to compensate, look out.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote