View Single Post
Old 2004-10-20, 10:34 AM   #30
LetItRev
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 501
 
Car: 2004 WRX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoelK
I've been debating between the M3s and Nokian WRs. It seems to me that the WRs will have 2-3x the treadlife and better (possibly quite a bit better) dry traction. The one thing I'm unsure of is what the exact difference between the two tires would be in the snow. I will probably drive about 7000 miles before I remove the tires in April/May and if I'm only going to get one season out of the M3s, then I'll go with the WRs.

Any thoughts?
Hey Joel,

I have used the Nokian Hakkapalitas (sp) for a season and a half. These were studded 205/70/15's for an outback. The tires were stellar. As others have mentioned, these were great in real ugly conditions. I lived at the lake and could get through anything with these tires. I wouldn't run a studded tire living in Reno though. Too much increased stopping distance for down here. (I'm not sure if the model you mentioned is studless or not).

Overall Nokian has a solid reputation for snow tires.
LetItRev is offline   Reply With Quote