View Single Post
Old 2003-08-01, 01:50 PM   #5
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArthurS
Actually APC was sued for 650,000$ for there tail-lights. Maybe the new ones are fine then?

Quote:
the NHTSB fined APC for $650000 for not having the reflective part of their taillight assemblies.

this is in the current issue of MOBILE ELECTRONICS, a trade related publication.
OWNED.

Here's my question... if they didn't have reflectors, how could they sell them in the US *at all* w/o a "for off road use only" disclaimer? And if they did have the FORUO disclaimer, then what law did they break to get fined?
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote