Thread: springs
View Single Post
Old 2006-09-27, 01:29 PM   #20
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3n2c3
Again, I really think the point is moot anyway, as GD springs are intended for a different chassis that's 500lbs heavier. There's an insignificant amount of money to be saved when compared to the potential problems.
That's less of an issue than you think. It just means that the RS will sit slightly higher and have slightly stiffer effective spring rates- neither is really a bad thing. The potential issue comes from free length vs. compressed length, but the higher rates the springs have, the less of a difference it makes.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote