View Single Post
Old 2006-10-08, 10:37 AM   #46
Mr. Xevious
Bucket Racing Team
 
Mr. Xevious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
I'm pretty sure Ripken played 100% of his games in his consecutive game record consecutively. Or it wouldn't be a record.

And if you ment to say "34% of the innings consecutively", you're wrong again, because you're only looking at the consecutive innings from his record for consecutive innings. 34% implys that before and after that record, he *never* played two innings back to back. I'm sure there were plenty of games in the iron man record where Cal played all 9. Far more than 34%.

And there's no way Gehrig played every inning of every game in his record. I'm even willing to bet that he missed a game or two in there, but in that era records weren't 100% accuratly kept, but who would come forward to say otherwise? Now I'm not implying that Ripken's the better ball player than Gehrig... Gehrig is probably one of the top 5 players in the history of the game... I'm just saying Ripken's record is the most fanstatic thing I've ever seen. Partly due to what it meant to baseball, which at the time was at a low-point due to the '94 strike. You could say Ripken saved baseball with that record.

As far as Canseco's 40/40... Ripken's record started in '82, Canseco's 40/40 was in '88. Also, I don't believe the 40/40 was all that influenced by 'roids. You don't steal 40 bases when you're all loaded up on juice... you lose too much flexibility/speed on that stuff. '88 was probably more like the 1st year people started getting into 'roids, which is why 40/40's don't happen any more even though 40 homeruns aren't even special anymore.

Finally, what does Cal's brother's rare Fuck Face card have to do w/ the scale of Cal's record?
I guess the problem I have with this record is its considered the "ironman" award, but you only need to play 7 innings of the game for you to be considered playing the entire game.

when I was talking about Canseco's record, I was talking about when the end of the record took place, not when Cal started it. Canseco was ripping huge home runs when he first started (anyone remember that shot in Toronto that went to the upper upper deck in the sky dome in 88??) so we have no idea if/when he started the roids. Check is picture from his 86 1/2 rookie card to his 88 card with the A's. he got pretty darn big fast.

and with the card.. I was making fun of the Ripkin family

and just a FYI.. I am a huge fan (is/still is) of the Bash Brothers
Mr. Xevious is offline   Reply With Quote