View Single Post
Old 2006-11-04, 12:00 PM   #62
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
No matter what I say, I'm pretty sure you will pick on something else. So choose to believe what you will.

As I said, the pancake progresses in both directions once the collapse starts, so no, the top should not hit still intact.

Puffs of smoke and dust are mostly indistinguishable on crappy low res video. And the later can be explained by just about anything related to stress and failure, escaping air, etc...

Witnesses are unreliable. "Explosions" are indistinguishable from very loud noises of other types, and nearly impossible to determine original source due to the limitations of the human ears, and the ease in which sound can be transmitted through different materials over great distances.

I'm not even going to start the Pentagon discussion.
First, thanks for allowing me to believe what I choose to believe, that's very generous of you.

Second, if you watch the video of the collapse, the upper floors litterally disintegrate without impacting anything... The top of the building begins to tip over, but then turns into dust.

Before you blame the evidence of explosive charges on an issue w/ video resolution, watch the video... http://911review.org/Wget/members.fo...explosions.htm Or better yet watch the documentary I linked, it's well outlined in that.

Also, you're saying that the guy who was blown through a wall and burned by a fireball in the basement of the building before the collapse was burned by a very loud noise? What about all firefighters that were in the building reporting explosions... are all of them "unreliable witnesses"?

I'm guessing you didn't watch the documentary I linked. I know it's long, but it does raise far more questions than the official story even attempts to answer. My point is not to convince anyone that this is what happened... my point is that the official description of what happened can't describe what was observed. Plain and simple: what the media and FEMA have told us is wrong and/or incomplete. Yet no one seems to care... in the last 5 years, Americans have just accepted that we live in a new world where terrorists will "get us" if we don't proactively stop them first. We believe this primarily because of what we believe happened on 9/11. If there's even just the slightest chance that 9/11 was really a big ol' case of insurance fraud, we need to prove it one way or the other, because the reality would be that we're making things far worse by hunting terrorists in their homes... we make them hate us more, and therefore we make them more dangerous to us, and all because some asshole to illegally demolish his buildings w/ some hijacked planes.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote