Quote:
Originally Posted by tysonK
What's not funny is this thread.
|
Indubitably.
Dear Scott and Joel,
It's pretty god damn simple. I'm saying that it's overboard to call that processor a dog given the circumstances.
I fail to see what the problem is with citing that it's rare for me to see 100% usage of my slower CPU as support for that statement. If you've ever had a CPU pegged at 100% usage, you know what a dog of a processor feels like. It makes the computer practically unusable.
Do you see how that's different than saying "...using less than 100% CPU means your computer won't be faster with a faster processor."?
I never said (nor otherwise indicated) that it wouldn't be faster with a faster processor, nor can I undestand how you would pull that out of your ass since I know your not as simple as your acting.