View Single Post
Old 2010-06-07, 04:38 PM   #25
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrobwoot View Post
MikeK, couldn't the same arguments be used by pedophiles? Or rapists? James Biela was just acting on what he felt. What's wrong with that? What if someone "feels" like they should be with animals? Can they have sex with a willing dog, or horse?
From a purely intellectual arguing on the internet perspective you are absolutely right, you found the loophole

However, back in reality I believe you actually understood the point I was making, and can actually see the difference between two gay people having sex and some guy raping and murdering a teenaged girl.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrobwoot View Post
But what about the people that are only into rape fantasies, or children?

Also, i've seen entirely too many videos of willing animal participants to agree with you there. If it is a male dog having sex with a female human, the dog is consenting by participating. That being said, what the hell kind of videos am I watching online? Oh, the beauty of the Internet...
I take it all back. You win the argument. Please don't ever visit me, especially if you own a hockey mask.
MikeK is offline