Legalize it?

[doubleurx]

burble, burble, burble......................what? burble, burble burble.

[van]

I say legalize and tax it. I think California will have this done in the next two years. I have little to no interest in it myself (haven't done it since high school 10+ years ago) but I see no reason to try and criminalize it. I think employers should still be able to screen for it though, if you chose to smoke your employment could be limited to food/customer service. When I'm old enough to retire I may want to smoke some pot when I'm fishing though, living my grandfathers lifestyle.

[Libila]

I'm a supporter of legalizing and taxing for all the reasons Scott pointed out earlier. There is no reason for it to be illegal, money can be made from taxes and farming; so why not?

[sperry]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091019/...ical_marijuana

Feds to issue new medical marijuana policy

Federal drug agents won't pursue pot-smoking patients or their sanctioned suppliers in states that allow medical marijuana, under new legal guidelines to be issued Monday by the Obama administration.

Two Justice Department officials described the new policy to The Associated Press, saying prosecutors will be told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana in strict compliance with state law.

The guidelines to be issued by the department do, however, make it clear that agents will go after people whose marijuana distribution goes beyond what is permitted under state law or use medical marijuana as a cover for other crimes, the officials said.

The new policy is a significant departure from the Bush administration, which insisted it would continue to enforce federal anti-pot laws regardless of state codes.

Fourteen states allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes: Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

California is unique among those for the widespread presence of dispensaries — businesses that sell marijuana and even advertise their services. Colorado also has several dispensaries, and Rhode Island and New Mexico are in the process of licensing providers, according to the Marijuana Policy Project, a group that promotes the decriminalization of marijuana use.

Attorney General Eric Holder said in March that he wanted federal law enforcement officials to pursue those who violate both federal and state law, but it has not been clear how that goal would be put into practice.

A three-page memo spelling out the policy is expected to be sent Monday to federal prosecutors in the 14 states, and also to top officials at the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration.

The memo, the officials said, emphasizes that prosecutors have wide discretion in choosing which cases to pursue, and says it is not a good use of federal manpower to prosecute those who are without a doubt in compliance with state law.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the legal guidance before it is issued.

"This is a major step forward," said Bruce Mirken, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project. "This change in policy moves the federal government dramatically toward respecting scientific and practical reality."

At the same time, the officials said, the government will still prosecute those who use medical marijuana as a cover for other illegal activity. The memo particularly warns that some suspects may hide old-fashioned drug dealing or other crimes behind a medical marijuana business.

In particular, the memo urges prosecutors to pursue marijuana cases which involve violence, the illegal use of firearms, selling pot to minors, money laundering or involvement in other crimes.

And while the policy memo describes a change in priorities away from prosecuting medical marijuana cases, it does not rule out the possibility that the federal government could still prosecute someone whose activities are allowed under state law.

The memo, officials said, is designed to give a sense of prosecutorial priorities to U.S. attorneys in the states that allow medical marijuana. It notes that pot sales in the United States are the largest source of money for violent Mexican drug cartels, but adds that federal law enforcement agencies have limited resources.

Medical marijuana advocates have been anxious to see exactly how the administration would implement candidate Barack Obama's repeated promises to change the policy in situations in which state laws allow the use of medical marijuana.

Soon after Obama took office, DEA agents raided four dispensaries in Los Angeles, prompting confusion about the government's plans.

[Kevin M]

Ironic that the liberal Dem is more interested in making something a state matter than the conservative Republican.

[ScottyS]

Originally Posted by Kevin M

Ironic that the liberal Dem is more interested in making something a state matter than the conservative Republican.

Sometimes they are reminded of the need.....yes.

[sperry]

Originally Posted by ScottyS

Sometimes they are reminded of the need.....yes.

I think the irony is less that the Democrats are for making it a state's right and more that the Republicans have forever been for fighting the drug war at a Federal level without ever thinking perhaps the states might be better off making their own laws.

In fact, when was the last time Republicans have argued for state rights? Certainly not when it came to abortion, gay marriage, gun control, school prayer, or teaching intelligent design. And last time I checked they were just as bad at expanding the Federal Gov't and taking away individual/local/states rights as the Democrats, if not worse.

[ScottyS]

I was referring to the tendency of liberal Dems to centralize gov't in their historical political desires, did I mention a contrast with Republicans? Nope. Don't get sucked into the polarization!