Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras  

Go Back   Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras > Car Enthusiast Forums > Technical Chat

Technical Chat Ask and answer technical car questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2005-02-02, 11:16 AM   #26
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK
There is some O2 sensor that goes into the end of the exhaust.

And you are correct, sybir or nate puts it in there
I wonder if that is yet a third machine/application, or just an add-on sensor for the ECUTEK? Probably the later. I don't know why it would be an input to the dyno.

Somebody who knows what the heck is what on Nate's setup speak up...
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 11:26 AM   #27
Nick Koan
JDM Cowboy
 
Nick Koan's Avatar
 
Real Name: Nick
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 8,642
 
Car: 2015 Mazda 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
I wonder if that is yet a third machine/application, or just an add-on sensor for the ECUTEK? Probably the later. I don't know why it would be an input to the dyno.

Somebody who knows what the heck is what on Nate's setup speak up...
Its an extra sensor for the Ecutek software.
__________________
While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN
Nick Koan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 11:27 AM   #28
AtomicLabMonkey
Nightwalker
 
AtomicLabMonkey's Avatar
 
Real Name: Austin
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 4,063
 
Car: '13 WRX
 
YGBSM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
As far as the features of the Street Tuner... it looks like the best you can do is datalog to a CSV file on disk that can "be imported into popular spreadsheet programs for display or graphing". You might be able to get the data you need to tune, but at the very least, it's going to be pretty tedious.
That's what I do with my Tweecer, it's not bad once you get used to it. I just import the CSV file into Excel and make my own graphs of the data.
__________________
"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you.. you're locked in here with me."
AtomicLabMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 11:52 AM   #29
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

The dyno should do hp. torque, a/f, and boost at a minimum. And lays all 4 on the same graph vs. rpm.

The street tuner software shows you real-time data. Whoopty do. Are you gonna just remember all those data points in your head, after reading them as they flash across the screen while you're driving? It only logs to a text file on disc. You have to open that file in another application to graph it. And that graph won't include the data coming from the G-Tech.

The EcuTek software (assuming it's similar to DeltaDash) will show realtime data, as well as graph all the data coming off the ECU. But that still doesn't show hp and torque, which is where the dyno comes in. And I don't consider the G-Tech a replacement for a dyno... there's no way the accelerometers are going to be all that accurate down a bumpy road, while attached to the windshield by a suction cup.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 01:27 PM   #30
AtomicLabMonkey
Nightwalker
 
AtomicLabMonkey's Avatar
 
Real Name: Austin
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 4,063
 
Car: '13 WRX
 
YGBSM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
The street tuner software shows you real-time data. Whoopty do. Are you gonna just remember all those data points in your head, after reading them as they flash across the screen while you're driving? It only logs to a text file on disc. You have to open that file in another application to graph it. And that graph won't include the data coming from the G-Tech.
I'm going with Dean in this argument. What you're describing is exactly what we work with on the mustangs, and it works just fine. Would it be nice if the software did absolutely everything for you? Sure, but it's not necessary. An Excel graph works just as well as a graph in the tuning program (or better).

Dyno tuning is great and all, but lots of pulls add up to be expensive and you can't be on a dyno 24/7 whenever you want to make some changes to your car. There's all KINDS of stuff you can tune by yourself on the street if you have this level of control over the ECU, from idle control, part throttle tip-in response, deceleration injector cuts, throttle breakpoints, etc. etc. etc. All of the little things can add up to a big difference in the way the car responds to you, and it's nice to be able to customize it so it feels ideal for you.

I understand you guys have to be more careful with what you do since your engines are boosted and on the verge of blowing up at anytime (), but trust me.. if you're comfortable with your level of knowledge on what you're doing it's very nice to have the control to change anything anytime.
__________________
"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you.. you're locked in here with me."
AtomicLabMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 01:31 PM   #31
MattR
El Matador
 
MattR's Avatar
 
Real Name: Matt
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 10,660
 
Car: 2012 Toyota Tacoma
Class: ?
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
I understand you guys have to be more careful with what you do since your engines are boosted and on the verge of blowing up at anytime (),

hahahaha! Thanks for the reminder. :shock:
__________________
"Dallas..We have a problem.”
MattR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 01:44 PM   #32
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
The street tuner software shows you real-time data. Whoopty do. Are you gonna just remember all those data points in your head, after reading them as they flash across the screen while you're driving? It only logs to a text file on disc. You have to open that file in another application to graph it. And that graph won't include the data coming from the G-Tech.
I'm going with Dean in this argument. What you're describing is exactly what we work with on the mustangs, and it works just fine. Would it be nice if the software did absolutely everything for you? Sure, but it's not necessary. An Excel graph works just as well as a graph in the tuning program (or better).

Dyno tuning is great and all, but lots of pulls add up to be expensive and you can't be on a dyno 24/7 whenever you want to make some changes to your car. There's all KINDS of stuff you can tune by yourself on the street if you have this level of control over the ECU, from idle control, part throttle tip-in response, deceleration injector cuts, throttle breakpoints, etc. etc. etc. All of the little things can add up to a big difference in the way the car responds to you, and it's nice to be able to customize it so it feels ideal for you.

I understand you guys have to be more careful with what you do since your engines are boosted and on the verge of blowing up at anytime (), but trust me.. if you're comfortable with your level of knowledge on what you're doing it's very nice to have the control to change anything anytime.
I'm not saying that tweeking the car is impossible... although I'm not totally convinced that it's a good idea w/o some previous tuning experience. I'm saying that tuning the car with the tools that Dean listed is tuning in the dark... you're not going to get the necessary into to see what's really going on.

For example, the wide-band O2 sensor has zero logging ability. You will have to somehow drive the car to the top of 3rd gear, and watch and remember the readings from the gauge. Then later, after you've got excel open to show the datalog, add in the A/F ratios to the chart. There's no way you're going to get that right...

Next, the data for hp and torque that he's going to be tuning against are coming from a notoriously innaccurate tool. G-Tech's are fun, and can sometimes tell you useful info in back to back runs, but they're not accurate enough to be used to actually tune hp and torque! If they were really that good, why would tuners spend $30,000 on a dyno when they could spend $300?

The current EcuTeck software (DeltaDash) already lets you bump base timing, idle speed, base boost, etc. The only reason to use something like the Street Tuner software is if you want to make specific adjustments to the maps at a specific RPM. I contend that without adequate data, making adjustments like that are a crap shoot: chances are you'll either make less power or risk the motor instead of improving on the dyno tuned map that's in the car to begin with.

Really, if you want to adjust for altitude, bump the base timing a degree, or add a pound of boost across the board (assuming you're not already pushing the efficiency of the turbo). Poking around in the maps isn't going to give you an advantage over the existing tools. Not to mention, there are a finite number of times you can reflash the ECU before the chips wear out... while the base offset feature of DeltaDash are stored in volitle memory that doesn't require buring the ECU.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 02:15 PM   #33
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

I think until we have the Street Tuner software in hand, this discussion is probably moot.

We can choose to disagree on Dynos, and G-techs... I think we agree Accelerometers and the real road <> Dynos in a garage. Which is more realistic/accureate, to tune to is probably as good as the springs vs. sway bar holy war. There are a number of things a Dyno cannot emulate, but there are also a number of things an accelerometer cannot reproduce as reliably as a dyno.

I am not claiming to be an instant expert, but unless I am mistaken, Nate didn't have a Dyno and ECUTEK SW until when, April 04? Perhaps he had previous experience with the Subaru maps, but he learned somehow, and hopefully didn't blow something up in the process.

If you make small tweeks you will probably never get out of the range for the knock sensor, and timing retarding systems to save you, especially if you are watching real time guages, and evaluating real time and/or recorded data.

I'm not sure Nate or any other tuner has any more tools than the ones I described. They may have slightly more data that is more closely linked, but I'm not sure how much. EGT is not really instantaneous, so it probably isn't much help on a dyno. Wide band 02 might be nice to be linked, but recognizing a spike and corelating it to the narrow band data from the ECU may be enough. What I'm describing may not be perfect, but people have certianley been tuning NA, and FI cars with fewer tools for years.

And as I said, Dynos, and experince are a great starting place, and I plan to take full advantage of them, but want to be able to take the next step as well monitor what has been done.

P.S. Unless I am mistaken, the Street tuner, just like the normal AccessPort does not write to the ECU EEPROM unless you force it to, so it does not use up any of your "flashes".
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 02:18 PM   #34
Nick Koan
JDM Cowboy
 
Nick Koan's Avatar
 
Real Name: Nick
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 8,642
 
Car: 2015 Mazda 3
Default

With the AP, there are real time maps and base maps. Base maps consume your limited number of flashes, but the Real Time ones don't.

I don't know what the exact parameters are, but there is a short list of things that the base map can do that the real time maps cannot.

Street tuner is the same was I believe.
__________________
While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN
Nick Koan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 02:39 PM   #35
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

You guys crack me up sometimes.

Dean, the advantage of the dyno is repeatability. You put he exact same lod on the car every run, so you get exact quantified data of what the last set of changes you made did. With a dyno and a couple hours, you can do every sort of load testing there s- steady-state cruise, tuning thottle tip-in, WOT runs, everything you and Austin has mentioned, for far less than the cost of one speeding ticket (or reckless driving, even). I plan to run a Hydra from Element in the car once it has a turbo, and it's going to get road tuned to make it drivable, then it's going to Nate. Then, everytime I go someplace with a change in altitude (Thunder Hill, Reno-Fernley, Stead, Infineon, wherever I'm racing) I'll do as much datalogging as possible to see if it actually NEEDS adjustment. I'm betting the tweaks will be minor with my car, because it's a speed/density setup. Tweaking all it will need to scrape that last 5-10 hp up. It's not as if the car will suddenly run poorly at high altitude on a good valley-tuned map. There may or may not be a few extra horepower left is all. Point is, you're spending a lot more on your equipment and assuming a lot more risk by attempting to tune your car yourself than you'd spend by letting Nate apply his experience (and training, and factory information sources) on his dyno, for the sake of small gains. Then there's the consideration of the hardware- there's a guy in Sac whose AP can't even report a CEL code properly (reported as "06B7" and believed to be "P0607"- Performance Control Module failure. ) and plenty of issues reported with adding and divorcing APs to cars.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 02:47 PM   #36
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

G'morning Kevin!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
What I'm describing may not be perfect, but people have certianley been tuning NA, and FI cars with fewer tools for years.
What I'm saying is that your planned method is going to be inferior to the method already used on your car. Aren't cars today faster than before? Isn't a lot of that due to the higher level of technology used in new vehicles, especially the use of computerized tuning?

I'm just getting a real "dude, I made my '92 Eclipse have like 400 horsepower, y0!" feeling from your plan.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 02:55 PM   #37
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
G'morning Kevin!
Yes, I slept until 2:45, woke up, leaned over, started my laptop and pointed my browser to SECCS Tech forum, just in case dean was posting something I can argue with.



You're just a hater because you don't get all 24 hours of your day to yourself.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:08 PM   #38
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Next you will be telling me a computerized alignment is better than a hand done one just because a computer is involved.

Dynos are not magic! Reproducable for a given environement, yes, but accurately reproduce real world conditions, NO! Put one in a wind tunnel on a motion control platform, and we can talk, otherwise, they are just a tool!

Next time I run over a Dyno on the straightaway at Thunderhill, or on my way to work, I will think otherwise.

A useful tool, but as with most tools, they have their limits. And I have heard a number of recent visitors to Nate's Dyno mention 3-4 pulls tops to tune a car. While I am sure this is good, it cannot compare to the data you can accumiulate in an hour, week, month or perhaps most important, LAP of real world driving.

Again, I am not saying Dyno time or the expertise of a trained tuner like Nate is not of value, in fact, I am saying it has great value, but I believe I can learn from him and augment his abilities with my own with the right tools and time.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:09 PM   #39
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
Next you will be telling me a computerized alignment is better than a hand done one just because a computer is involved.

Dynos are not magic! Reproducable for a given environement, yes, but accurately reproduce real world conditions, NO! Put one in a wind tunnel on a motion control platform, and we can talk, otherwise, they are just a tool!

Next time I run over a Dyno on the straightaway at Thunderhill, or on my way to work, I will think otherwise.

A useful tool, but as with most tools, they have their limits. And I have heard a number of recent visitors to Nate's Dyno mention 3-4 pulls tops to tune a car. While I am sure this is good, it cannot compare to the data you can accumiulate in an hour, week, month or perhaps most important, LAP of real world driving.

Again, I am not saying Dyno time or the expertise of a trained tuner like Nate is not of value, in fact, I am saying it has great value, but I believe I can learn from him and augment his abilities with my own with the right tools and time.
You sound like the average Utec user. Good luck Dean.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:10 PM   #40
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

By the way, I like it when Austin and I agree. He does this stuff for a living, just like Nate...
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:16 PM   #41
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
just like Nate...
Except that Nate, with all of his professional experience, uses a dyno. And, I'd bet you that Austin's company either owns or has arrangements for access to a dynomometer as well. Further, while I don't mean to knock Austin's knowledge in any way, since he's far superior to me when it comes to automotive engineering, he's not familiar with Subaru engine tuning, as he's made clear more than once with comments about how we all do things so differently than what he knows about Ford V8s. It's just like when the DSM or turbo Honda guys hsow up on subaru boards and start spouting off about MBCs and AFCs. They know plenty about the cars they know best, but that doesn't make them subaru experts.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:18 PM   #42
MikeSTI
EJ205
 
MikeSTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
 
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
 
I can't complain
Default

EcuTech says the ECU can take way more then 100 reflashes and that its just a rumor as far as the number of base flashes an ECU can take

EcuTech also says that thier ECU has been flashed more then 300 times with no failure I'm sure this would be the same for Cobb reflashes
__________________
Cobb Stage 2
MikeSTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:19 PM   #43
MattR
El Matador
 
MattR's Avatar
 
Real Name: Matt
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 10,660
 
Car: 2012 Toyota Tacoma
Class: ?
Default

Damn you Mike K for starting this mess and not staying with it!

I predict at least 4 pages out of this one...at least it's a good topic..
__________________
"Dallas..We have a problem.”
MattR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:25 PM   #44
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
You sound like the average Utec user. Good luck Dean.
No, I sound like an informed technical person who will do the dilligence to ensure he doesn't hurt anything, and who understands the value of professionals, but also understands the limitations placed on those professionals by outside forces such as economics, and time.

I would appreciate both you and Scott not associating my comments with those of the bleeder valve boost controller and no gauges portion of the automoile enthusiast spectrum.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:26 PM   #45
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
You sound like the average Utec user. Good luck Dean.
No, I sound like an informed technical person who will do the dilligence to ensure he doesn't hurt anything, and who understands the value of professionals, but also understands the limitations placed on those professionals by outside forces such as economics, and time.

I would appreciate both you and Scott not associating my comments with those of the bleeder valve boost controller and no gauges portion of the automoile enthusiast spectrum.
Just so you know dean, you don't tune with gauges, you tune with datalogging. Gauges are a failsafe for when you aren't tuning.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:28 PM   #46
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Just so you know dean, you don't tune with gauges, you tune with datalogging. Gauges are a failsafe for when you aren't tuning.
Please either go back to sleep, or read the whole damn thread. We spent much of page 1 discussing data logging, so please bite me!
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 03:42 PM   #47
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Just so you know dean, you don't tune with gauges, you tune with datalogging. Gauges are a failsafe for when you aren't tuning.
Please either go back to sleep, or read the whole damn thread. We spent much of page 1 discussing data logging, so please bite me!
Dean, I don't understand your fascination with wanting to avoid new technology. I said you sound like a Utec user, not a DSM tuner (I was implying Austin was, tongue-in-cheek). Utec user love to espouse the virtues of road tuning for one reason- they don't own dynos. You keep attempting to discredit a dyno for being a "tool" when that's all ANYTHING is, including one's experience. Neither Scott nor myself is saying that road tuning is useless or pointless. But to say that you can accomplish everything you can with a dyno by roadtuning is a mistaken assumption. Dynos are superior tuning tool to road testing, although road testing can be useful as well in its own ways. I'll give you a shining example of why that is. Let's say you've got your shiny new streetTuner, your G-Tech, and your laptop out on whatever desolate, flat, long, straight strecth of road you think is your personal test track. On your 19th pull, you think you've got yuur map pretty set, just one or two more tweaks. So you make those tweaks, and do the next pull. Only on htis one, you get a slightly stronger headwind, and your G-Tech says you lost 4 peak horsepower, even though your changes were the "right" ones. So you go back to the old way, or even worse, change something different, and poof, the G-Tech says you're back to +1 above the previous pull. Nice repeatability, considering the dyno will NOT lie to you about the effect of a given change IF it's properly set up.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 04:09 PM   #48
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattR
Damn you Mike K for starting this mess and not staying with it!
Sorry, but this thread is about 50 times longer than my attention span
Attached Images
 
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 04:09 PM   #49
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
You keep attempting to discredit a dyno for being a "tool" when that's all ANYTHING is, including one's experience.
I am in no way attempting to discredit it, in fact I have repeatedly mentioned it's value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Neither Scott nor myself is saying that road tuning is useless or pointless. But to say that you can accomplish everything you can with a dyno by roadtuning is a mistaken assumption.
I never said that...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Dynos are superior tuning tool to road testing
This is where the holy war begins. My claim is that they are different, and each has value. Period! Please do not attempt to put other words in my mouth.

Unless a Dyno is in a wind tunnel that is emulating the wheel speed, it is providing a skewed view of how the car will work on the road. And as we both mentioned, the road has issues with reproducibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
...the dyno will NOT lie to you about the effect of a given change IF it's properly set up.
Everything the Dyno tells you is in some small respect, a lie. A repeatable lie which has quite a bit of value, but none the less a lie about how the car will perform in an on road environment.

Air flow causes drag, and down force and any number of other things that affect the car in a number of ways, these are not emulated by the dyno. The Dyno contact patch is not the same as the road contact patch, thus, any rolling resistance calculations are at best, a crap shoot, etc.

Dynos are not magic! Subarus are not Magic. Road tuning is not Magic. There is physics, knowledge, experience, learning, experimenting, success, and failure. No Magic, bullet, or otherwise.

I choose to value the knowledge and experience of others, build the same within myself by learning which involves acknowledging the above, experimenting, success, and failure. If done properly, my failures will be small, and outnumbered or overwhelmed by my successes.

You choose your own path.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-02-02, 04:11 PM   #50
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Dean, I guess the argument I'm trying to make is not that tuning w/o the dyno isn't a viable tuning method, it's just that it's lower tech than the way your car was already tuned...

Think of it this way: you bring a length or steel to a professional to get its length measured. They used an expensive set of calipers to measure it accurately to the nano-meter. Then you bring it home and notice that it's 10 degrees hotter at your house. So you bust out your wooden ruler and decide to measure it yourself because you know the steel must have expanded due to temperature.

I'm not saying that the 1st measurment is totally exact after the temp change, and I'm not saying that the wooden ruler is necessarily going to give you an incorrect measurement. I'm just saying that it's going to be very hard to improve on the original measurement w/o the high-end tools.

People use the tools available to them. For years, people have been measuring their steel rods w/ wooden rulers, and it worked. But now that we've got the more accurate calipers, you're going to find it hard to improve on those results with the old tools.

Now, you could certainly take the caliper measured length, and do the math to figure out how much the length should change from a +10 deg temp difference, and estimate the new length, and I would bet that's a pretty accurate value. Similarily, you should be able to bump base timing or boost to help compensate for altitude, but I wouldn't try re-tuning the car, or re-measuring the steel rod.

Am I making sense? That analogy feels tortured.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yet Another Brake Pad Thread. Dean Technical Chat 83 2009-05-10 02:43 PM
AutoX Class Line-up? dknv Motorsports Chat 98 2006-04-07 10:42 AM
Reno SCCA Street Tire changes MattR Motorsports Chat 14 2005-12-27 03:35 PM
How to figure out your autocross class in a Subaru Kevin M Motorsports Chat 5 2005-04-29 08:24 AM
What class am I??? khail19 Motorsports Chat 14 2005-04-28 01:35 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.