Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras  

Go Back   Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras > Car Enthusiast Forums > Technical Chat

Technical Chat Ask and answer technical car questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2006-09-14, 12:05 PM   #1
Joeyy
i can has kart?
 
Joeyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,228
Default Intake

Thoughts on this intake for the grocery getter. https://www.subarugenuineparts.com/p...oducts_id=1075
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Joeyy; 2006-09-14 at 12:38 PM.
Joeyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 12:37 PM   #2
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Cobb tested the hell out of that intake on the LGT and STi. Neither is exactly a WRX but it is interesting reading:

LGT
STi

It has been a while since I read them, but their conclusion is that it is a waste of time on the LGT, and a very minor improvement on the STi. I think they decided that it fared better on the STi because it has a bigger turbo, so the stock intake was a slight restriction.

Based on this I would estimate that on a WRX it should be considered a cosmetic mod, not a performance mod.
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 12:41 PM   #3
Joeyy
i can has kart?
 
Joeyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,228
Default

Copy that. The hell with cosmetic I want more POWER!...
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Joeyy; 2006-09-14 at 12:44 PM.
Joeyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 03:32 PM   #4
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

More Power? Aren't you still on the stock exhaust? If so, that's your restriction.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 03:42 PM   #5
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Upipe, exhaust and reflash are the cheap power for a WRX. From there it starts getting expensive fast! If you are really desperate for more power a used STi might work out cheaper in the long run.

Otherwise, the next logical step would be fuel pump/injectors/turbo/STi intercooler/reflash.

(Followed closely by an RA gearset for your tranny).
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 04:24 PM   #6
Nick Koan
JDM Cowboy
 
Nick Koan's Avatar
 
Real Name: Nick
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 8,642
 
Car: 2015 Mazda 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK
Upipe, exhaust and reflash are the cheap power for a WRX. From there it starts getting expensive fast! If you are really desperate for more power a used STi might work out cheaper in the long run.

Otherwise, the next logical step would be fuel pump/injectors/turbo/STi intercooler/reflash.

(Followed closely by an RA gearset for your tranny).
Nah, its cheaper to mod the WRX for more power. Just ask Scott.
__________________
While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN
Nick Koan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 05:56 PM   #7
M3n2c3
EJ205
 
M3n2c3's Avatar
 
Real Name: Jeremiah
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 1,888
 
Car: 2005 Impreza 2.5RS, 2000 Forester L
Class: RNP sometimes (see motto)
 
"Kids are ruining autocross."
Default

I know next to nothing about the turbocharged Impreza motors, but from what I've read, intake involves some hassle with tuning, and if the SPT intake claims it won't void your warranty but has no disclaimers regarding needing a tune after installing, then it probably won't really do anything for you. That's just my take on it.

Of course, if you were NA, then I'd be saying different. . . after driving Cory's RS and having seen the night and day difference even my own car gets in power just while driving at different times of day (cooler, denser air in the wee hours of the morning = more power), I'm all for intake mods on NA engines.

Anyway, more exhaust bits seem to be the way to go, and you could always just go with a snorkel delete.
__________________
Small red text that looks curious at first glance but is ultimately inconsequential
M3n2c3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 07:58 PM   #8
doubleurx
EJ205
 
doubleurx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Truckee
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nKoan
Nah, its cheaper to mod the WRX for more power. Just ask Scott.

Yah, he got that truck for a great price!
__________________
Does it have a motor..............Does it have a motor?
doubleurx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 08:30 PM   #9
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3n2c3
Of course, if you were NA, then I'd be saying different. . . after driving Cory's RS and having seen the night and day difference even my own car gets in power just while driving at different times of day (cooler, denser air in the wee hours of the morning = more power), I'm all for intake mods on NA engines.
Unfortunately, the difference is not so much turbo vs. NA, but MAF- vs. MAP-based engine management. MAF cars generally do not like intakes, especially newer ones with sensitive AFR expectations. In your case, I would stick to the silencer delete. CAIs are only really good for '00-'03 EJ25 cars.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-14, 09:09 PM   #10
M3n2c3
EJ205
 
M3n2c3's Avatar
 
Real Name: Jeremiah
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 1,888
 
Car: 2005 Impreza 2.5RS, 2000 Forester L
Class: RNP sometimes (see motto)
 
"Kids are ruining autocross."
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Unfortunately, the difference is not so much turbo vs. NA, but MAF- vs. MAP-based engine management. MAF cars generally do not like intakes, especially newer ones with sensitive AFR expectations. In your case, I would stick to the silencer delete. CAIs are only really good for '00-'03 EJ25 cars.


[denial]I still intend to get a short-ram. . . [/denial]
__________________
Small red text that looks curious at first glance but is ultimately inconsequential
M3n2c3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dyno Numbers Dean Technical Chat 519 2019-02-24 10:29 AM
Sti Intake Manifold MorganK User Classifieds 0 2006-06-06 10:52 PM
Intake Manifold + Stage 2 T-case Evo Mike General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat 7 2006-02-10 02:19 PM
Injen intake Reno 911 User Classifieds 1 2005-09-02 04:30 PM
Air Intake Options? 2000 2.2 MattR Technical Chat 8 2005-05-03 08:19 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.