The new Saab 9-3, born from WRX... - Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras

badrover · 2007-10-24, 11:49 PM

http://www.saabusa.com/saabjsp/93s/i...model_viewer=1

the similarities are very striking, and i know that the Swedes have used the WRX platform in the past to make 9-3's.

Discuss

AtomicLabMonkey · 2007-10-25, 12:36 AM

Sverde borde berde.... Bork Bork Bork!

khail19 · 2007-10-25, 07:22 AM

I'm not seeing the similarity. Do you think it looks like the 2nd gen or 3rd gen Impreza?

And the 9-2x was built on a WRX platform, I'm not aware that any of the 9-3 models ever were.

Kevin M · 2007-10-25, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey

Sverde borde berde.... Bork Bork Bork!

Even the mere words "swedish chef" still make me chuckle.

/me goes off to youtube to giggle at cultural stereotypes

M3n2c3 · 2007-10-25, 09:08 AM

Yeah, I think you've got the 9-3 mixed up with the old 9-2x. These look nothing like a Scoob, are FWD, and the components and dimensions are way off.

And a turbocharged 2.8L 6 cylinder that only puts down 255hp? Subaru would never let that happen.

bxracer69 · 2007-10-25, 09:26 AM

Looks more lke a new BMW more than the new WRX

Nick Koan · 2007-10-25, 09:31 AM

Also, Saab didn't make the 9-2x. FHI/Subaru manufactured it almost in its entirety. So, Saab never really had a hold of any plans or blueprints or whatnot.

sperry · 2007-10-26, 09:36 AM

The 9-3 is nothing like a WRX, except perhaps in that it's got a lot of turbo lag like the 2.0L WRXs used to.

And the reason the turbo 6 motor they're using is only 255 hp is because anytime you build a FWD car with much more than 250 hp, it drives like crap. Torque steer is unmanageable, tire wear is awful, the car power-on pushes excessively. That motor will probably make 300+ hp in the aftermarket.

But the AWD 9-3 promises to be a pretty nice setup. Not only do you get the haldex AWD setup, they also bump the boost and the motor makes 280hp.

newyorkreload · 2007-11-01, 01:24 AM

Sounds like AWD is where it's at.

2007-10-24, 11:49 PM	#1
badrover EJ18 Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Minden, NV Posts: 39 Car: 2008 Subaru WRX Class: TBD The journey always outweighs the destination.	The new Saab 9-3, born from WRX... http://www.saabusa.com/saabjsp/93s/i...model_viewer=1 the similarities are very striking, and i know that the Swedes have used the WRX platform in the past to make 9-3's. Discuss

2007-10-25, 12:36 AM	#2
AtomicLabMonkey Nightwalker Real Name: Austin Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Oshkosh, WI Posts: 4,063 Car: '13 WRX YGBSM	Sverde borde berde.... Bork Bork Bork! __________________ "None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you.. you're locked in here with me."

2007-10-25, 09:08 AM	#5
M3n2c3 EJ205 Real Name: Jeremiah Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Lubbock, TX Posts: 1,888 Car: Current: 2014 Forester 2.5i Premium. Old: 2005 Impreza 2.5RS, 2000 Forester L Class: RNP, long ago (see motto) "Kids are ruining autocross."	Yeah, I think you've got the 9-3 mixed up with the old 9-2x. These look nothing like a Scoob, are FWD, and the components and dimensions are way off. And a turbocharged 2.8L 6 cylinder that only puts down 255hp? Subaru would never let that happen. __________________ Small red text that looks curious at first glance but is ultimately inconsequential Last edited by M3n2c3; 2007-10-25 at 09:10 AM.

2007-10-25, 09:26 AM	#6
bxracer69 EJ22 Real Name: Nick Langkamp Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On the Road Posts: 384 Car: 2003 Mitsubishi Evo8 Class: SM Snowboarding....Because gravity is cheaper than gas	Looks more lke a new BMW more than the new WRX __________________ My better is better than your best. My fast smells like french toast. www.langkampracing.com

2007-10-25, 09:31 AM	#7
Nick Koan JDM Cowboy Real Name: Nick Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Somewhere Posts: 8,642 Car: 2015 Mazda 3	Also, Saab didn't make the 9-2x. FHI/Subaru manufactured it almost in its entirety. So, Saab never really had a hold of any plans or blueprints or whatnot. __________________ While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN

2007-10-25, 07:22 AM	#3
khail19 EJ205 Real Name: Khail Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Reno, NV Posts: 1,769 Car: 2016 VW GTI Meets? We have meets?	I'm not seeing the similarity. Do you think it looks like the 2nd gen or 3rd gen Impreza? And the 9-2x was built on a WRX platform, I'm not aware that any of the 9-3 models ever were.

2007-10-26, 09:36 AM	#8
sperry The Doink Real Name: Scott Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 20,335 Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata Class: PDX/TT-6 The way out is through	The 9-3 is nothing like a WRX, except perhaps in that it's got a lot of turbo lag like the 2.0L WRXs used to. And the reason the turbo 6 motor they're using is only 255 hp is because anytime you build a FWD car with much more than 250 hp, it drives like crap. Torque steer is unmanageable, tire wear is awful, the car power-on pushes excessively. That motor will probably make 300+ hp in the aftermarket. But the AWD 9-3 promises to be a pretty nice setup. Not only do you get the haldex AWD setup, they also bump the boost and the motor makes 280hp. __________________ Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?

2007-11-01, 01:24 AM	#9
newyorkreload EJ18 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Cow Town: The City of Trees Posts: 33 Car: 02, Subaru Impreza WRX "I have lived so many lives, all in my head"	Sounds like AWD is where it's at.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
High altitude PAX	sperry	Technical Chat	56	2006-11-10 08:53 AM
SVX suspension, Attn: sybir!	sperry	Technical Chat	30	2005-10-17 04:21 PM
WRX TR	cody	General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat	12	2005-09-15 10:51 AM
Subaru Only Track Day at Thunderhill - Who Wants Some?	Egan	Motorsports Chat	53	2004-09-29 08:28 AM
PR - Subaru WRX Wins USTCC Seasone Finale	GarySheehan	Motorsports Chat	13	2003-12-04 10:05 PM